Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse

Effects of noise suppression and envelope dynamic range compression on the intelligibility of vocoded sentences for a tonal language

Download (385.87 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 14:52 authored by Fei Chen, Dingchang Zheng, Yu Tsao
Vocoder simulation studies have suggested that the carrier signal type employed affects the intelligibility of vocoded speech. The present work further assessed how carrier signal type interacts with additional signal processing, namely, single-channel noise suppression and envelope dynamic range compression, in determining the intelligibility of vocoder simulations. In Experiment 1, Mandarin sentences that had been corrupted by speech spectrum-shaped noise (SSN) or two-talker babble (2TB) were processed by one of four single-channel noise-suppression algorithms before undergoing tone-vocoded (TV) or noise-vocoded (NV) processing. In Experiment 2, dynamic ranges of multiband envelope waveforms were compressed by scaling of the mean-removed envelope waveforms with a compression factor before undergoing TV or NV processing. TV Mandarin sentences yielded higher intelligibility scores with normal-hearing (NH) listeners than did noise-vocoded sentences. The intelligibility advantage of noise-suppressed vocoded speech depended on the masker type (SSN vs 2TB). NV speech was more negatively influenced by envelope dynamic range compression than was TV speech. These findings suggest that an interactional effect exists between the carrier signal type employed in the vocoding process and envelope distortion caused by signal processing.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

142

Issue number

3

Page range

1157-1166

Publication title

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

ISSN

1520-8524

Publisher

Acoustical Society of America

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2017-09-28

Legacy creation date

2017-09-13

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Faculty of Medical Science (until September 2018)

Note

Copyright 2017 Acoustical Society of America. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and the Acoustical Society of America. The following article appeared in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142 (3). pp. 1157-1166. ISSN 0001-4966 and may be found at https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5000164.

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC