posted on 2023-08-30, 14:42authored byAndrew Nicholson
Legislative changes in Great Britain in the 1980s introduced a competitive, quasi-market in
education (Woods, Bagley and Glatter, 1998) in which parents are able to exercise choice
about the school they wish their child to attend. Parents specify (and sometimes rank) their
preferred schools and places are allocated on the basis of those preferences, if school
capacity permits (Woods et al, 1998). In order to thrive in this educational market, schools
must appeal to parents and will use a variety of means to make a positive impression. This
study asks three questions about school choice.
1. To what extent do parents and school staff agree which are the most important
factors parents consider when choosing a school for their child?
2. To what extent do parents and school staff have a shared understanding of the
concept of ‘school reputation,’ and what is the relative importance both place on it as a
factor when choosing a school?
3. What are the implications for schools?
The study is based in an all-through (educates children aged 4-18) Academy Trust of three
schools (two primary and one secondary) in a socially and economically diverse town in
the East of England. The inquiry paradigm adopted is one of pragmatism with the
utilization of two data collection methods within a case study methodology. Quantitative
data were collected from parents and school staff using a ‘card sort’ of eighteen choice
criteria that were placed in order of relative importance. The card sort task was taken home
by pupils for completion and returned for collation and analysis using a predesigned ‘Data
Analysis Plan’. Fifty-two cards sorts were completed by staff groups and thirty-nine card
sorts were returned by parents / families. Of the eighteen criteria for school choice, twelve
indicate an extremely significant or very significant difference between what parents say
they rank most highly, and what school staff think parents rate most highly. School staff
believe parents place greater emphasis on school reputation than parents say they do
Qualitative data was collected from ten semi-structured interviews (six parents and four
staff) and thematically analysed to elicit a deeper understanding of parental choice in this
community. The meaning of ‘school reputation’ is understood in different ways between,
and within, groups of parents and school staff.
Three implications for practice in the Trust schools arise from the study:
1. School leaders need to understand the social makeup and therefore the likely
motivations of the people in the locality from which the intake is drawn.
2. School leaders must recognize the importance of academic achievement in school
choice.
3. School reputation can be managed by improving the quality of teaching and
learning.
I expect my ‘particularized’ study to be of tangible use to the Academy Trust in which it is
based, but as this is an issue of contemporary strategic relevance to all school leaders, the
findings are likely to be transferable to other settings.