Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
Global Ecology and Biogeography - 2023 - White - The contribution of geographically common and rare species to the spatial.pdf (1.58 MB)

The contribution of geographically common and rare species to the spatial distribution of biodiversity

Download (1.58 MB)
Version 2 2024-01-05, 11:36
Version 1 2023-09-01, 15:26
journal contribution
posted on 2024-01-05, 11:36 authored by Hannah White, Caroline McKeon, Robin Pakeman, Yvonne Buckley

Motivation and aim: Mapping the spatial distribution of biodiversity is critical for understanding its fundamental drivers (e.g. speciation, environmental filtering) as well as for conservation assessment. An important dimension of this topic is how the distributions of subsets of species contribute to the overall distribution of biodiversity. Although studies have previously investigated the role of geographically common and rare species in determining these patterns, their respective contributions appear to vary between studies. Knowing which species contribute disproportionately to the spatial distribution of biodiversity enables the identification of key indicator species for biodiversity assessments across large areas and is important for prioritising areas for conservation actions. An extensive review of the literature was carried out to synthesise research on how geographic rarity contributes to spatial patterns of biodiversity. We identify potential explanations for the discrepancies in findings between studies and identify opportunities for further research.

Results: Many studies on the contribution of geographic commonness and rarity to the spatial distribution of biodiversity focus on species richness. A prevalent view is that common (widespread) species contribute disproportionately, although this is not ubiquitous across studies due to factors such as the geographic extent from which relative rarity is quantified. We identify research pathways that will further improve our knowledge of how geographically common and rare species shape the spatial distribution of biodiversity including the impact of spatial scale on species contributions and the incorporation of biodiversity components beyond taxonomic alpha diversity, that is functional and phylogenetic diversity.

Main conclusions: Future research should incorporate multiple biodiversity components and model scale dependency. This will further our knowledge on the underlying processes that shape the spatial variation of biodiversity across the planet and help inform biological surveys and conservation activities.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

32

Issue number

10

Page range

1730-1747

Publication title

Global Ecology and Biogeography

ISSN

1466-8238

Publisher

Wiley

File version

  • Published version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2023-07-05

Legacy creation date

2023-07-05

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

Faculty of Science & Engineering

Affiliated with

  • School of Life Sciences Outputs

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC