Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
- No file added yet -

Practices and perceptions of strength and conditioning training in female golf: A cross-sectional survey study of high-level amateur players

Download (1.95 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-04-10, 09:51 authored by Luke Robinson, Andrew Murray, Margo Mountjoy, Jack Wells, Dan Coughlan, Danny Glover, Rebecca Hembrough, Fiona Scott, Anthony Turner, Chris Bishop

This study aims to ascertain an in-depth understanding of current  practices and perceptions of S&C training in high-level amateur  female golfers. A cross-sectional, explorative survey study was  constructed which asked questions relating to four key areas: i) general  participant information, ii) current strength and conditioning  (S&C) practices, iii) the perceived influence of S&C training on  golf performance, and iv) knowledge and awareness of S&C. Results  showed that the majority of female players had participated in some form  of S&C training in the past, with the majority believing that  clubhead speed and carry distance were the primary golfing metrics which  could be positively impacted. More specifically, 91–97% of the players  “Strongly agreed” or “Agreed” that the key physical characteristics for  golf were strength and power for the lower and upper body, and  flexibility. Interestingly, 58% of the players believed that S&C  training should mimic the movement of the golf swing, which based off  current evidence, is not how drive metrics and ultimately shots gained,  can be maximised. This survey study provides useful information relating  to the practices and perceptions of S&C training in high-level  female amateur players and areas where education may be able to further  advance player understanding of physical preparation. 

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Page range

1-11

Publication title

Journal of Sports Sciences

ISSN

0264-0414

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

File version

  • Published version

Language

  • eng

Affiliated with

  • School of Nursing and Midwifery – Chelmsford Outputs

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC