Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse
DOCUMENT
Maguire_et_al_2021.pdf (308.06 kB)
DOCUMENT
Maguire_et_al_2021.docx (67.18 kB)
1/0
2 files

Is the pink ball still under review? Cricket umpires’ perceptions of the pink ball for day/night matches

journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-30, 18:36 authored by Robert Maguire, Matthew A. Timmis, Luke Wilkins, David L. Mann, Eldré W. Beukes, Haimisha Parekh, James Johnstone, Joshua Adie, Derek Arnold, Peter M. Allen
Objectives: The visibility of the pink ball used in day/night Test cricket has been under scrutiny, with recent research suggesting cricketers find the pink ball less visible at dusk under floodlights. With increasing interest in this match format, this study sought to investigate elite umpires’ opinions pertaining to the visibility of the pink cricket ball during day/night matches. Design: Purposeful sampling of a cross-section of elite umpires with experience adjudicating matches played using a pink cricket ball. Methods: Twenty-seven international/first-class umpires completed a questionnaire consisting of Likert scale and free text responses covering perceptions of the pink cricket ball, with a particular emphasis on visibility. Results: The pink ball when viewed at night under floodlights was rated as being significantly more visible than the red ball during natural lighting (ps < 0.050). Umpires who actively participated in training reported a significantly higher rating of the visibility of the pink ball (mean −3.14) at night under floodlights compared to those who didn’t (mean p = 0.010). No significant difference was reported in visibility in natural light or dusk under floodlights. Free text responses (n = 10) revealed the following themes: use of eyewear (coverage 0.30), and adjustment to positioning (coverage 0.20) to improve visibility of the pink ball. Conclusions: Umpires report the visibility of the pink ball is equal to the red in natural light and at dusk but is significantly better at night. Preference for the pink ball is likely due to the predominantly perceptual nature of visual tasks performed by umpires.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

24

Issue number

11

Page range

1166-1172

Publication title

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

ISSN

1878-1861

Publisher

Elsevier

File version

  • Accepted version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2021-06-10

Legacy creation date

2021-06-10

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

Faculty of Science & Engineering

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC