posted on 2023-08-30, 20:36authored byRosie Kwon, Hyung Jun Kim, Seung Won Lee, Ai Koyanagi, Jae Il Shin, Tae-Jin Song, Dong Keon Yon, Lee Smith
Objective: Famotidine has been proposed as a promising candidate for the treatment of
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is limited research on the association
of famotidine with the poor prognosis of COVID-19.
Methods: The Korean nationwide cohort included 6,556 patients who tested positive on RT-
PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The poor COVID-
19-related outcomes were defined on the basis of having encountered the composite outcome
of high oxygen therapy, intensive care unit admission, administration of mechanical
ventilation, or death. In addition, we performed exposure-driven propensity score matching
for no H2-blocker use versus current famotidine use, and other H2-blocker use versus current
famotidine use.
Results: 4,785 (73.0%) patients did not use a H2-blocker, 393 (6.0%) patients were currently
used famotidine, and 1,292 (19.7%) patients currently used H2-blocker other than famotidine.
In multivariable analysis after matching (no H2-blocker use versus current famotidine use),
there was no significant association between current famotidine use and composite outcomes
(adjusted odd ratios [aOR]: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-3.06). On the other hand,
another matched cohort (other H2-blocker use versus current famotidine use), demonstrated a
positive association between current famotidine use and composite outcomes (aOR: 3.56, 95%
CI: 1.03-12.28)
Conclusions: Our study results did not support the potential of famotidine as a therapeutic
agent for COVID-19. A rather unexpected result could be observed in the comparisons
between current famotidine use and other H2-blocker use; it was observed that current
famotidine use increased the risk of poor COVID-19 related outcomes. Further studies are
needed to clearly prove the causal relationship with several H2-blockers, including
famotidine.