Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse

Development and validation of a computational model of the knee joint for the evaluation of surgical treatments for osteoarthritis

Download (4.1 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-26, 14:02 authored by Rajshree Mootanah, Carl W. Imhauser, Franziska Reisse, Diagarajen Carpanen, Robert W. Walker, Matthew F. Koff, Mark W. Lenhoff, S. Robert Rozbruch, Austin T. Fragomen, Zarshah Dewan, Yatin M. Kirane, Kevin Cheah, John K. Dowell, Howard J. Hillstrom
A three-dimensional (3D) knee joint computational model was developed and validated to predict knee joint contact forces and pressures for different degrees of malalignment. A 3D computational knee model was created from high-resolution radiological images to emulate passive sagittal rotation (full-extension to 658-flexion) and weight acceptance. A cadaveric knee mounted on a six-degree-of-freedom robot was subjected to matching boundary and loading conditions. A ligamenttuning process minimised kinematic differences between the robotically loaded cadaver specimen and the finite element (FE) model. The model was validated by measured intra-articular force and pressure measurements. Percent full scale error between FE-predicted and in vitro-measured values in the medial and lateral compartments were 6.67% and 5.94%, respectively, for normalised peak pressure values, and 7.56% and 4.48%, respectively, for normalised force values. The knee model can accurately predict normalised intra-articular pressure and forces for different loading conditions and could be further developed for subject-specific surgical planning.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Volume

17

Issue number

13

Page range

1502-1517

Publication title

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

ISSN

1476-8259

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

File version

  • Published version

Language

  • eng

Legacy posted date

2017-01-25

Legacy creation date

2017-11-29

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Faculty of Science & Technology (until September 2018)

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC