posted on 2023-07-26, 16:06authored byStavros Samaras, Charles M. Malata
Introduction:
Monitoring buried flaps in reconstructive breast surgery is challenging, and the ideal technique is
controversial. Established options include leaving an exterior (“buoy” or “sentinel”) skin paddle versus
invasive implantable devices to avoid removing the paddle later. Technical modifications and an algorithm
for strategic skin paddle positioning to circumvent this while avoiding complex monitoring equipment are
proposed.
Patients and methods:
Patients in whom buoy skin paddles were utilized for breast flap monitoring by a single surgeon were
reviewed. Indications, demographic details, precise monitoring paddle location, and flap outcomes were
evaluated. An algorithm and classification system were then formulated.
Results:
Thirteen buoy skin paddles were utilized in seven patients (mean age: 43.5 years; range: 31-65) to monitor
reconstructive flaps performed for risk-reducing mastectomies (four patients and seven breasts), therapeutic
mastectomy (one breast), and revision surgery (three patients and five breasts). The flaps comprised seven
deep inferior epigastric artery perforators (DIEPs), four superficial inferior epigastric arteries (SIEAs), and
two pedicled latissimus dorsi (LDs) (mean free flap weight: 809 g; average mastectomy weight (n = 10
breasts): 467 g; range: 248-864). The skin paddles were located horizontally along the inframammary crease
or vertically inferior to the nipple-areola or both. All flap transfers were successful with no re-explorations.
All patients declined the monitoring paddle excision, and none have requested breast mound revision for
poor cosmesis or contour deformities.
Conclusion:
Vertical and horizontal skin paddles proved reliable for buried flap monitoring without recourse to invasive
and expensive equipment. When designed appropriately, they do not require revision surgery. An
algorithmic classification of skin paddle location to enable this is proposed.