Anglia Ruskin University

File(s) not publicly available

A Comparative Analysis of Goldmann Tonometry Correction

journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-26, 15:14 authored by Magdalena Asejczyk-Widlicka, Wieslaw Srodka, Barbara K. Pierscionek
Purpose: The measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is based on assumptions about corneal parameters. To correct for variations in corneal curvature and thickness, a number of equations have been proposed. This study evaluates the in vivo accuracy of these equations from individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma and compared them with measurements taken using the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), which makes no assumptions about the corneal geometry or biomechanics. Participants and Methods: The study included 108 participants with primary open-angle glaucoma (47 male and 61 female) with an age range of 39 to 81 years. Participants were recruited from the Glaucoma Clinic at Wroclaw Medical University. A full ophthalmologic examination was conducted on all participants. Participants were divided into 3 groups depending on IOP as measured by GAT. Six formulae were applied and the results were compared with measurements taken with DCT. Main Outcome Measures: To determine as to which formula provides the closest value to IOP measured with DCT. Results: For IOP values ≤29 mm Hg, 2 of the formulae showed the smallest and comparable mean differences and SDs between corrected IOP values obtained with GAT and those measured with DCT. For IOP≥30 mm Hg, the formula derived from the model of corneal applanation that takes into account corneal buckling showed the closest agreement with measurements taken using DCT. Conclusions: Correction formulae provide widely varying results and their appropriateness can depend on the IOP values.



  • Yes



Issue number


Page range


Publication title

Journal of Glaucoma




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins


  • other

Legacy posted date


Legacy Faculty/School/Department

ARCHIVED Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education (until September 2018)

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs


    No categories selected