Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Who Gets to Challenge Contemporary Thinking on Rape? Contradictions and Confusion in Public Opinion of “Rape Justice”

chapter
posted on 2023-07-26, 15:59 authored by Olivia Smith, Ellen Daly
Drawing on findings from a 2021 YouGov survey of public opinions of rape justice, this chapter discusses whose voices matter when it comes to contemporary rape justice policy. The survey findings demonstrate that public conceptualisations of “rape justice” are complicated and contradictory and raised questions about whose perception of rape justice matters when there are conflicting ideals at play. While on the surface it seems that there is broad consensus for a rebalancing of the alleged victim and accused's rights, victimhood is very narrowly conceived. The data suggest that the deeply entrenched misconception that women routinely lie about rape remains pervasive and that the public have a fundamental misunderstanding of what rape is and how it can be proven in court. The implications of ill-informed public opinion on rape justice in practice are explored, with a focus on juries. Ultimately, the authors call for a balance between “expert” opinion and informed public opinion.

History

Refereed

  • Yes

Page range

189-202

Number of pages

320

Publisher

Routledge

Place of publication

London

Title of book

Rape: Challenging Contemporary Thinking – 10 Years On

ISBN

9781003163800

Editors

Miranda A.H. Horvath, Jennifer M. Brown

Language

  • other

Legacy posted date

2022-09-15

Legacy Faculty/School/Department

Faculty of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences

Usage metrics

    ARU Outputs

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC